Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Jun 14

In Development

Posted by edwin in Writing

As a newbie, one may ask, “How do I get into the film industry here in Australia?” What do I have to do?

Writing and organising a team of like-minded individuals towards the common goal of actually making a movie is being in the industry. All you do is write and put together submissions or proposals. Once you are writing – you are in the film industry. You don’t need anybody else to tell you otherwise.

Over 95% of your time will be spent writing scripts, auditioning for a gig or meeting with actors, producers and financiers.

In the last two years, I have been lucky. I was actually on set, directing . . . for nearly two whole weeks! (A Stone Throw and Streetsmartz).

The rest of my time was spent:

  • Writing (I’m pleased to report . . . most wannabes talk about writing. Don’t be a wannabe!).
  • Earning a living (building websites).
  • Teaching others how to write, direct and build websites (at Curtin University).
  • Meeting with producers and greater mortals who may help get new projects happening.

Unfortunately I wasn’t one of the 60+ directors chosen for a gig on Marx and Venus *sniff*. It’s possible that my screenplay will be one of the 25 selected from the 1,700+ screenplays SBSi received (although I won’t wait by the phone).

Either would have been nice – but these things come in waves.

The Hottest Director in Town

Usually the hottest directors in town get the gigs – and then they move aside as new heat comes into play. The heat is off me right now because my latest short film didn’t hit too many festivals or accumulate gongs. You’re considered hot if your film so much as hits a festival these days as it’s difficult to even get a screening. Another industry truism to consider as a director is that you are only as good as your last film.

All of this is twaddle, naturally. But it’s something you feel as you walk into a room filled with investors. Who is this guy – what’s he done recently? The corridor rumours are that Troy Lum (Hopscotch Distribution) will only consider developing screenplays which have a hot director attached.

Nobody tells you that you are hot. But it’s your job to know it . . . Ask an honest friend. None-hot directors need hot people attached to their projects. This usually translates to a producer or an actor. And here’s a tip for for the non-hot.

Every actor is looking for a good role.

Our New Screenplay

Phil and I have manged to scrabble together a sketchy outline for a new horror screenplay. This one is much straighter than we usually write . . . a genre piece. But interesting enough to keep us amused. We don’t have a producer attached just yet. Which, in itself, is a bit exciting.

Meetings with Tait Brady (FFC) have been organised with the Australian Writers’ Guild. Hitting the submit-your-synopsis-for-a-meeting deadline is next cab off the rank.

So . . . as usual it’s back to the pen.

If you want to be part of the great Australian film industry – you might want to stope earning money and get out your own. I hear it’s mightier than the sword.

Ninety-nine percent of the time!


I’m writing with Phil. He’s just popped out. We’re planning our next screenplay. A traditional horror about a man who sees the error of his ways – just in time.

The early draft of Beware the Stingray is so busy that we’ve managed to extricate three screenplays out of it. One of them – the short film, A Stone Throw – is doing the festival circuit as we speak.


And as we write, more characters keep leaping out – threatening to muddy the waters of our existing screenplay.

But we remain vigilant. As interesting as all our ideas are, only the story-oriented ideas should remain. Jot the others in a notepad, or do like we’re doing and embark on a completely different screenplay.


Why are you reading this?

Stop it. Get on with your own screenplay.

In this materialistic, cancer-ridden nuclear paranoid society – it seems to be the only reasonable thing to do. So – if you’ve come to Geoffrey because you’ve got a really good idea. Write it! I’ll tell you this for nothing . . . Nobody else will.

May 23

Burning the candle at both ends

Posted by edwin in Thoughts, Writing

This is a picture of us writing. Notice how there’s only one of us at the computer? I’m on a beanbag. Phil does the writing, and for those of you who know me well, I talk. I’m actually taking random photos with my new CanonA430 (I highly recommend it) while Phil taps away.

Lately, we’ve been pleasantly surprised by our work. Twelve years on it looks like we have a worthy mani character (Katy) and a good, solid story.


This is how we got to the screenplay on this particular rewrite:

  1. We used the Clare Dobbin Matrix to analyse the existing story
  2. We broke the story down into about 16 sequences, tracking our main character
  3. We titled each sequence (for main character) and made micro-notes on 3 x 5 cards
  4. We discussed the hell out of each sequence from the main character’s story POV
  5. We attacked the screenplay scene by scene

It’s taken us about 3 weeks. That’s 2 full days writing per week. It’s nice to be able to say that. Feels like we’ve achieved something.

So far we’re up to page 20 and we haven’t lost sight of our main character, Katy.

My Life otherwise . . .

I get up at 6am, check my Curtin students’ online assignments and queries, do website updates, meet with potential clients, chase existing ones for unpaid invoices, continue working on current client websites, mark student assignments, eat stuff and finally write with Phil until . . . well . . . now roughly. Which gives me 6hrs sleep.

All I want to do is sleeeeeeeep.

I wonder what it would be like to die?

I read somewhere that if humans were immortal, the average age would be about 200 years (based on the number of fatal household accidents alone).

Phil commented on that last piece. I forget that people actually read these things. I assumed you were all lazy and didn’t read anything ;)

Yes . . . as Phil says . . . we have taken time to write this screenplay. And it’s depressing to think about it.

Sometimes I feel like Marshall in Absolutely Fabulous. Marshall went to Hollywood 20 years ago to develop a screenplay with a studio. People in various episodes ask him how it’s going. He usually has an actor attached, or a big producer, or an out-of-work director . . . No doubt Jennifer Saunders has met a few of these people. The industry is teaming with writers working on a screenplay. Until a screenplay becomes a film – it’s only a blueprint – not considered an art form in itself. And yet it takes such a long time to write one.

When people ask me what I do – I answer web designer. It’s my knee-jerk, “pat” response. It’s also less problematic and gets me more $work than if I say, “filmmaker”. But saying “web designer” feels like somehow I’ve lied – like I’m undercover – posing as a normal person.

A boxer called me up the other day (not the dog kind) and told me he had a really good idea for a screenplay. I called his bluff and asked to see the paper version. Really good ideas are two-a-penny.

Legally, if you told a screenwriter (like myself) your really good idea and he wrote it – verbatum . . . it would then become his really good idea. He has legal proof of the idea and you don’t. While writing is poorly renumerated, it is considered evidence in a court of law. It’s why Production Companies ask you to sign a waiver before you submit your work. They also have really good ideas, but at least their ideas are in development (which means on paper).

“Have you written anything, yet?” I asked him, doubtfully. He stumped me by having a bit of a draft to show me (very unusual) . . . and it wasn’t as bad as it could have been!

I had a spare couple of hours, So I did some notes on his screenplay. He was so chuffed, he offered me a couple of boxing lessons . . . I settled for a service testimonial.

So here we both are, working on a screenplay we started in 1994. Call us Marshall.

On the bright side – the story has held our interest for all those years and it has led to many other screenplay ideas. The learning curve alone has catapulted our abilities as writers.

Now that some time has passed between our Arista experience, A Stone Throw and working with Sydney-based script-editor, Duncan Thompson . . . the holes in our script are painfully clear. There are so many really good ideas flying wildly about that we often lose sight of our main character . . .

Katy.

I think that if we can rope the story in – and really make it hers – we will, as some have already pointed out, have a great work before us. In the meantime, I have 100 uni assignments to mark before Phil arrives (for writing session 2013466) . . .

If you’ll be so kind as to excuse me . . . the kettle beckons.

Apr 19

Let your screenplay brew

Posted by edwin in Writing

The other day I saw a locally made feature, The Actress. It was really quite good – for what it was. But my heart sinks when I see a well-directed film with huge writing holes. Holes which are easy to fix if you give your screenplay time to brew.

Directors are Stupider Than Writers


It is common knowledge that directors, in the main, are stupider than writers – often led into projects ego first. But even the stupidest director could probably do well with a short course in screenwriting. Because if you can’t read a feature film in the first place, how can you direct one?

Sam Mendez and Alan Ball are a case in point. After the success of American Beauty, Alan went on to write the multi Emmy Award winning Six Feet Under. And Sam? Well . . . just have a listen to the audio commentary on Six Feet Under and you can hear what’s driving Sam’s engine. Interesting that the commentary is credited as Sam Mendez with Alan Ball.

Writing is one way to remain humble. You get lousy pay (if anything) you get to stand in the shadow of an ego-maniacal director and you get ignored at parties. Nobody sleeps with the writer . . . Except in TV . . . Where writers get to be producers.

So. Back to me. I’m (supposedly) both writer and director. However this year, I’ve spent about 4 days actually directing anything and about 2 weeks writing. So mostly, this year, I’ve been a university lecturer – or a web developer. Hopefully I’ll get a gig on Marx and Venus – but one can’t count on such things.

Yesterday, at least, Phil Jeng Kane and I returned to writing our feature screenplay – probably because this week we have no students. It’s a Curtin Uni / FTI holiday. We did a little preparation. Coffee, toast, diary entries etc. And then we started analysing our script with a tool shown to us by Claire Dobbin at an Arista workshop.

The Plot Matrix

If you haven’t visited your screenplay for a while (in our case nearly a year) then use the plot matrix. In your spreadsheet program, make 5 columns:

  1. Scene number.
  2. What is the scene about?
  3. Whos scene is it?
  4. What is the emotional subtext?
  5. Do we need the scene?

Then read through each scene (aloud) and answer the questions. The final column we chose to colour:

  • red means remove the scene
  • orange means modify it
    • we’d write a note about how we will do that
  • green for leave it pretty much as is

This way, you get a quick visual representation of how your screenplay is. If the last column is all green – then that’s teh writers’ green light! It means go find a Producer you can trust with all your hard work.

You will end up with a bunch of notes for your next draft and you will know more about your main character/s journey. Plus you will have the feeling that you’ve just breathed life into something that seemed permanently in a state of suspended animation.

I found our clarity of purpose was very acute. Because after a long time:

  1. We approach an old subject with fresh eyes
  2. Our critical faculties weren’t distracted by precious writing.
  3. Any ill-feeling / previous bad dealings we had regarding the project were gone.
  4. We re-discovered the energy we had when we originally started writing it
    1. in our case – all those years ago.
  5. If you’re writing with a partner, you’re also working on a friendship.
    1. After all – if two people are co-writing the same project over a long period, then there has to be something special about the idea.

In about half a day (5 hours) we got through 20 scenes this way and hope to finish the other 80+ by early next week.

So – my advice is – leave it on the shelf. And if you have another idea – work on that. Do a rough draft. Even if it’s crap – a lot of good stuff will bubble to the surface later in your screenplay’s life. If you use . . . The Matrix!

Mar 17

Marx & Venus SBS TV series

Posted by edwin in Filmmaking, Writing


I just added a link to Taylor Media’s website for Marx and Venus (I did the site). The SBS script deadline is March 31st, but, as I did her website and Sue Taylor is exec-producing the show (with Natalie Bell, Ian Booth and Francesca Strano line producing the 25 episodes) I felt it my duty to let everyone know that TM is looking for directors, DoPs and editors.

My CV is in. Phew! But I’m thinking of submitting a cover letter. Or hopefully, explaining my particular during interview – and without trying to sound like I’m gonna break house-style.

Writing with other people . . . Ooooh

I’ve written two episodes of M&V so far – one with local writer, Richard Hyde and one all by myself. I want to write one with Phil Jeng Kane, but I want it to be his idea. I’m second credit on Richard’s and I want the same credit on Phil’s. Three scripts sounds reasonable and not too greedy – especially if I’m working with other people.

“What? What kind of filmmaker are you? Get an ego man. This is a competition, not a kabutz. ‘I want it to be his idea!‘ What’s all this second credit stuff? Don’t you want all the glory? There’s hardly any cash. What do you get? Two grand? You gonna split that two ways?”

Well, Angry Filmmaker – my reason is simple. A second writer’s credit (to me) – means that I’m working on someone else’s idea. Or, at least, that person instigated the screenplay (ideas are free). Working with another writer is different to script editing. As co-writer (I hate the term because often co-writers do as much – sometimes most of the work) I have permission to change (or in my case hack into and delete – sorry about that, Richard) the other writer’s words and dialogue.

As a script editor (and by the way writers, I will script edit your work for a very reasonable fee. Click here to find out about that) I have no such write – er – I mean “right”. I see my job as being the writer’s spiritual guide and mentor. Script Editors should guide the writer towards what it is he/she wants to say. It’s a bit different in TV tho – ;) – but that’s how I reckon it should work in a perfect world. And we’re all heading for that. Right, Aristotle?

As co-writer, you don’t get final say on the screenplay. Whic is good because tehre’d be too much to-ing and fro-ing over little stuff.

But as local producer, Carmello Musca put it to me one day (this is why Phil and I have a script with him) . . . “The writing doesn’t finish until the execs have left the editing room.” That’s someone who knows the business. The best producers share a similar POV in my experience. Beware those who don’t!

“Ahh, shut up! You talk a lot of crap. What have you done? A few shorts? The odd TV show? Who cares about your Pee Oh Vee, man? Im going to Hollywood. I don’t need ScreenWest’s money. I know a couple of guys . . . Anyway. Just wait ’til you see me strut my stuff man. I have talent.

The door is to your left, Angry. Talent is never enough.

Yeah. He’s gone now. If you’re going to work with other people, you have to respect what it is they do. And listen to what they have to say. There are a lot of frustrated and angry filmmakers out there. I pity that guy.

Jun 28

Cutting out the story

Posted by edwin in Writing

Hello.

Just got back from Sydney where I was lucky enough to work with editor, Tim Wellburn (Black Robe, Mad Max 2 etc. etc.). Dale Fairbairn (my Producer) convinced him and Island Films to get involved in our 10 minute, ScreenWest funded short, “A Stone Throw.”

I wrote the screenplay with Phil Jeng Kane and no matter how hard we tried, the picture cut just wasn’t working. We were slowly losing our story with each attempt and we needed a fresh, experienced set of eyes. There were some difficulties with coverage, but they seemed to dissolve with Tim at the helm.

It took him 4-5 days. I let him choose takes, cutting style – the lot and I must say, he did a fine job. He really got into the story. The cut was fresh, new and completely understandable. I was so happy to see the film working. He’d solved all the problems we’d had with previous cuts (there were 4 of those). Most problems were brought about by limited coverage on an incredibly tight, TV-style shoot.

Now we have to get ScreenWest approval before we go into track lay (Richard Mahony), music (Jonathan Mustard), mix and final online.

Stay tuned.